✏️Built for UX designers, product designers, and design leads

Your designs are thoughtful.
Your design conversations should be too.

Great UX doesn't ship itself. The designers who get their work built are the ones who can defend decisions, facilitate research, and earn the trust of engineers and PMs. Commy gives you a private space to practice those conversations.

No signup required. Full AI feedback on your first drill.

The conversations design school doesn't teach

Every product designer recognizes at least three of these.

🎨

Presenting design decisions to stakeholders who disagree

You've done the research. The design is right. But the VP of Product wants it a different way because 'that's how our competitor does it.' Defending a design decision under pressure — without getting defensive — is the hardest part of design craft that no portfolio teaches.

🔬

Facilitating user research and discovery sessions

User research lives or dies on the quality of the questions. Leading a session, staying neutral, following unexpected threads, and not inadvertently biasing participants — most designers learn this by making expensive mistakes, not by deliberate practice.

📋

Pushing back on scope changes that undermine the design

Engineering says there's no time for the onboarding flow you designed. Product says 'just make it work without the empty states.' You know these shortcuts will hurt the experience. Saying so — with specificity and without being precious — is a skill most designers never develop.

🤝

Getting buy-in from engineering on design implementation

The handoff is never just Figma links. The subtleties of interaction, spacing rationale, state handling — most engineers will implement the letter of the spec and miss the spirit. The conversation that bridges that gap requires you to speak in both design and technical language simultaneously.

Scenarios built for UX designers

Practice the conversations that determine whether your design work gets built faithfully.

Design DefenseAvg: 58/100

Defending a design decision to a skeptical VP

You've designed an onboarding flow grounded in user research. The VP of Product thinks it's too long and wants to cut three screens. Your research shows those screens directly address the top 2 churn triggers. Practice making the case with data — without sounding like you're lecturing.

Research FacilitationAvg: 63/100

Facilitating a user research interview

You're running a 30-minute discovery session with a new user. The goal is to understand their current workflow and uncover latent pain points. Practice asking open questions, probing without leading, and following unexpected threads — the skills that make research actually useful.

Cross-functional PushbackAvg: 60/100

Pushing back on an engineering shortcut that hurts the UX

An engineer tells you the loading state you designed 'adds complexity' and they're going to ship without it. You know that without it, users will think the app is broken. Practice making the case for implementation fidelity — concretely, not emotionally.

Research CommunicationAvg: 57/100

Presenting research findings to drive a product decision

You've run 8 user interviews. The findings are clear: users don't understand the core value proposition. Leadership has been invested in the current flow for months. Practice presenting research that challenges existing assumptions — without making it feel like an indictment.

Feedback & MentorshipAvg: 65/100

Running a design critique with the team

You're facilitating a critique session on a junior designer's work. The design has real problems. Practice giving specific, actionable feedback that builds the designer's skill — not just redirects the work. Critique that teaches is a completely different skill than critique that corrects.

What improvement looks like

Defending a design decision under pressure

Before

Explains the design process. Stakeholder sees it as justification, not rationale. Gets overruled.

After Commy

Leads with user research and business outcome. Makes the tradeoff explicit. Stakeholder engages.

44/100
81/100

Pushing back on an engineering shortcut

Before

Emotional appeal to quality. Gets dismissed as being precious about the design.

After Commy

Specific user impact. Concrete failure scenario. Technical solution proposed. Engineer reconsiders.

48/100
80/100

Presenting research findings to leadership

Before

Lists findings without connecting to decisions. Room appreciates the work, ignores the implications.

After Commy

Frames findings as decision-forcing questions. Makes the implications unmissable. Team acts on it.

51/100
83/100

From designers who've drilled with Commy

"I used to present designs and wait for feedback. Now I present with a point of view and a rationale. The difference in how my work gets received is night and day. The design defense drill completely changed my presentation style."

Senior Product Designer

Consumer app, 5-person design team

"User research facilitation is something I learned the hard way — years of slightly leading questions and missed threads. Commy let me practice in a way that felt remarkably real. My research quality has genuinely improved."

UX Researcher

Enterprise SaaS, mixed-methods research

"Design leaders are expected to be strategic partners. But most of us were trained as craftspeople. The stakeholder communication drills helped me get comfortable in rooms where design is being treated as decoration."

Design Lead

Series A startup, founding designer

Design the experience.
And the conversation around it.

Try a UX communication drill now — no signup required. Get AI coaching on how you defend, facilitate, and influence — not just whether your wireframes are pixel-perfect.

Try a free design drill →

No signup. No credit card. Full AI feedback on your first drill.

Frequently asked questions

What is Commy?

Commy is an AI communication coaching platform that helps professionals practice salary negotiation, difficult conversations, leadership communication, and public speaking through interactive drills with real-time AI feedback and scoring.

How does AI communication coaching work?

You choose a realistic professional scenario — like negotiating a raise or handling a conflict. You speak or type your response. Commy's AI analyzes your communication in real time and provides specific scores and feedback on clarity, confidence, empathy, assertiveness, and structure.

Is there a free plan?

Yes. Commy offers a free plan with 5 drills per day, all scenario types, and full AI feedback and scores. No credit card required. The Pro plan ($12/month) offers unlimited drills and personalized coaching.

What types of communication can I practice?

Commy covers 12+ scenario categories including salary negotiation, job interviews, conflict resolution, performance reviews, public speaking, client pitches, executive presence, difficult conversations, investor pitches, giving feedback, brainstorming sessions, and cross-cultural communication.

How is Commy different from traditional coaching?

Traditional communication coaching costs $200-500 per session and requires scheduling. Commy provides unlimited AI coaching available 24/7 at a fraction of the cost, with consistent scoring and immediate feedback after every drill. You can practice the same scenario repeatedly until you master it.